Twitch ([info]twitch115) wrote,
@ 2007-07-19 04:03:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:public

A question of human nature. Of your nature.
I intend this as an open question for anyone that happens to read this text.

It's generally accepted that there is a common element that inspires everyone to connect with others, but what they seek from these relationships is often altogether different, and from these differences basic and unavoidable conflicts tend to arise unless there is a clear dialogue and open communication about these needs, but I digress as usual.

My question to you, whomever you may be, (feel free to respond anonymously if you don't want me to know who you are.) is: What do you look for / find most important in relationships with other people?

Do you:

seek emotional affirmation?
try to convince others of your competence and logic?
look to others for a sense of security in a tangible fashion?
or simply to enjoy yourself and feel stimulated?

I know this seems rather vague and I'm sure some people would look at this and say "Well obviously everyone thinks/feels such-and-such because that's the way I see things," but I'm hoping for a bit more objectivity than that would seem to imply. I ask that you step outside yourself and take into consideration the relationships you have with other people (both the good and the bad) and ask what it is that's most important to you.


This will also serve as my only open post, as I'm locking it down from here on out if for no other reason than because I feel like it. If you want to be added, respond to this question in a thoughtful manner.




(28 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]hippychibi
2007-07-24 03:01 am UTC (link)
you know how i work my man.
i hope to enjoy life as much as i can and i hate being bored, it depresses me like nothing else can.
life is for happyness and pleasure that only can be gained from being with people and working for the betterment of the whole group.
and what do you mean by locking out?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]twitch115
2007-07-25 11:33 pm UTC (link)
Would you say that you naturally see the patterns and inner workings of things, or are you more likely to see what's on the surface and have a constant desire for new experiences and people?

On a side note, are you still planning on being teacher? We haven't really talked in a while.

I just meant that this journal is now private except for this post.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]hippychibi
2007-07-27 12:39 am UTC (link)
surface with drive for new things and experiences. you know i don't look into things very deep. excedpt the government. they are lying bad people.

and yes i do want to be a teacher. i'm going to graduate someday and then teach young high school kids about life and communication. it'll be great.
^_^

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]moonfiresword
2007-08-07 12:14 am UTC (link)
I would like to think that the only thing I look for in relationships would be to have fun and enjoy myself but really it would probably have to be that I end up looking for people to care about me. It isn't like I don't care back, it's just I like to have it said out loud and things that they care as much as I do. Of course this has led to a few bad relationships in which of course the other person is just bullshitting, saying what they know you want to hear, or they do believe that they care and because they care I end up staying despite the fact it obviously doesn't work. So. That's me and my short comings.

(Reply to this)


[info]came_well9
2008-01-07 09:41 am UTC (link)
I guess I look for a common interest/ground with the opposite sex. Something that I know is worth working with as well as someone who I can care for/care for me.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]twitch115
2008-01-07 06:28 pm UTC (link)
A bit of follow up due to brevity.

Do you prefer to uphold traditions and traditional roles or find new ways to do things (i.e. stick to the metaphorical or literal recipe or improvise to find new and better ways)?

From what I've seen here, I assume you're more of a planner than a fly by the seat of your pants sort of person, but feel free to correct me on that as well if you like.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]came_well9
2008-01-08 08:52 am UTC (link)
Eitherway works,but the new way sounds better.Your right,I am kinda a planner in the field. And maybe that's why it never works.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]danthemanitac
2008-01-15 11:41 pm UTC (link)
I am going to answer this in the more general friendship and family relationship type. since I have no experience in the other kind.

I will admit that in my own arogance that I do try to convince others of my competence and logic. other than that, I gues to enjoy myself; talk about the day, have fun and to play.

going back to that convince others thing, now that I think about it, I do it more than I should. I love to argue my points in a discussion to no end. my love of arguing probably gets me in more trouble than anything else I do.

oh dear I seemed to have ranted.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]twitch115
2008-01-16 05:34 am UTC (link)
An excellent rant and probably the singularly best response thus far, but just to clear up a singular point of curiosity: Is it more important to learn something new or find something worthwhile and just do it?

i.e. Does the drive for knowledge overshadow the need for experience?

Or to put it a third way, is learning just a stepping stone to doing, or is it the other way around?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]danthemanitac
2008-01-16 05:42 am UTC (link)
... I am going to go with finding something worthwhile and do it. though I am not a shining example of that, than again who is a perfect example of what one should do.

Knowledge is important if it is put to use, and only than. still I get wound up in the learning part.

(the spelling thing happens)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]enderrises
2008-02-26 06:02 pm UTC (link)
You don't know me, but I randomly stumbled on this and decided to answer.

In my best relationships I am a healer. I try to and usually succeed at finding what hurts people inside their own minds and find out why it does so and how to stop it.

In my more normal relationships I simply like human contact. I like talking to people, sharing ideas, and the like.

If your other journals are as thought provoking as this one I'd like to be added to your friend's list so I can continue to read.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]twitch115
2008-02-28 05:07 am UTC (link)
Consider it done.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2009-10-15 04:43 am UTC (link)
1) I like to share things. I realized that when I discover something that I consider valuable, if I dont have someone to share it with, it feels depleted of meaning. Of course, it has to be someone that will comprehend the value of said discovery.

2) I like it when someone takes care of me. People perceive me as strong and capable, so it is very rare when someone actually offers me a helping hand (even to listen to what I have to say or keep me company) I appreciate it deeply.

3) To have fun and exchange thoughts. I love to listen to others and imagine what's going on in their heads.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]twitch115
2009-10-15 04:47 am UTC (link)
What do you imagine is going on in my head right now?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2009-10-15 04:50 am UTC (link)
Probably some safari excursion with a furious stampede of zebras.

Its either that or you are trying to help me figure out my enneatype while checking your gmail, researching some other topic, browsing through forum posts and playing with google images, all in different tabs.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]twitch115
2009-10-15 05:17 am UTC (link)
It involved a poodle circus but you get points for effort.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

stalker points ;)
[info]likethewave
2009-10-24 06:39 am UTC (link)
i tend to connect with people in the realm of ideas and the imagination. to me anything less is small talk. despite the cliche of looking to the sky to daydream, i think these abstract realms are really the foundation of all else, and vital for communication of any sort of depth and value. ~peace

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: stalker points ;)
[info]likethewave
2009-10-24 06:43 am UTC (link)
PS i just realized that because of my tendency to hangout in the abstract, when i don't make that connection with people i tend to come across as ridiculous and absurd, at best, and batshit crazy (as they like to say) at worst.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: stalker points ;)
[info]twitch115
2009-10-25 06:44 am UTC (link)
How terrible. I thought for sure you'd find the new forum before you happened into this. Not that I mind.

Oh well. Let's see where else you can find me.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: stalker points ;)
[info]likethewave
2009-10-25 01:09 pm UTC (link)
haha, you're right, googling an email handle is very stalker 101. and taking the first result at that! you added me right? i *did* answer the question. besides, there may be clues in the recesses of your journal that might further inform my benevolent stalking expedition, however darkly.

i had been given a link to the other forum, but i haven't gotten around to exploring it much. now that i've realized you must have taken your active lurking there, well, it must be interesting. there.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: stalker points ;)
[info]twitch115
2009-10-25 06:27 pm UTC (link)
Oh, there are more than clues. There are explicit links directed at accounts elsewhere. That's why I haven't added you yet. ;)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: stalker points ;)
[info]likethewave
2009-10-25 06:49 pm UTC (link)
But I answered the question!!

How about I give up stalking and settle for access to your thoughts instead.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: stalker points ;)
[info]twitch115
2009-10-25 08:22 pm UTC (link)
Tch. Fine. Suit yourself.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: stalker points ;)
[info]likethewave
2009-10-25 10:18 pm UTC (link)
haha, sucker! (kidding! don't block me!)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2009-10-29 04:46 am UTC (link)
I believe that my relationships with other people is primarily to enjoy myself and to feel stimulated, but also to a certain extent, to look for a sense of security in a tangible fashion. I think the latter is the initial cause for the formation of these relationships, and then as time passes by, it dissolves into the former. Why is that we seek to make new friends and form new relationships when we are presented with an unfamiliar environment. I suppose part of this comes with our adaption to the environment - in the company of others, we may be able to maximise our chances of survival (in both extreme and everyday situations). Some of these relationships fall apart as we adjust to the environment, because a mutual support network is not required anymore and people are now free to be more specific in the type of people they wish to bond with. The ones that usually remain and continue to exist over time are the more genuine ones that you have made effort to maintain. To some extent, it is for emotional affirmation - these are the relationships you are comfortable with sharing your emotions with others. On another perspective, we may share common interests and this leads enjoyment and emotional stimulation.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]twitch115
2009-10-29 11:51 pm UTC (link)
The sense I get from this response is that you're familiar with Maslow's hierarchy of needs and that you're answering my question based on that knowledge. I'd add you as a friend if I could, but since you've opted into anonymity, the best I can do for now is point out that the majority of this appears to be highly generalized unless, of course, you have moved around to at least a few different areas over the years causing you to lose regular contact with old friends; in which case my initial impression could conceivably be rendered more or less baseless as such a pattern would make your assertions plausibly reachable without outside influence.

I'm curious to know which is the case or whether it's something else entirely.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2009-10-30 08:58 am UTC (link)
I wasn't sure what kind of response you were looking for so I tried to be as objective as possible, hence I wrote a generic situation.

I've seen Maslow's hierachy of needs but I wouldn't exactly that I'm "familiar" with it. But I would definitely say that it's based on my own observations, both personal and the situations of my friends.

My personal situation isn't that interesting. Basically there were some friendships I had when I was still at school that I never put much effort into maintaining. I guess it was sort of common place common time that drew us together because we never really connected.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]twitch115
2009-10-30 06:00 pm UTC (link)
Makes sense. Thanks for the response.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(28 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…